Mgr. Lenka Selecká, PhD.

Krys, K., Kostoula, O., van Tilburg, W. A., Mosca, O., Lee, J. H., Maricchiolo, F., ... & Uchida, Y. (2025). Happiness maximization is a WEIRD way of living. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17456916231208367

Václaviková, I., Selecká, L., Démuthová, S., Blatný, M. & Hrdlička, M. 2020. The Predictive Importance of Selected Protective Factors against Different Types of Antisocial Behavior Manifested by Adolescent Boys and Girls. Studia Psychologica : An International Journal for Research and Theory in Psychology. ISSN 0039-3320, Roč. 62, č. 2 (2020), s. 138-147.

Démuthová, S., Selecká, L. & Démuth, A., 2019. Human facial attractiveness in psychological research: an evolutionary approach. 1. vyd. - Berlin: Peter Lang, 2019. 211 s. [13,82AH]. (Spectrum Slovakia, ISSN 2195-1845; volume 21). ISBN 978-3-631-79772-3.

Selecká, L., Václaviková, I., Blatný, M. & Hrdlička, M., 2017. Typológia antisociálneho správania: špecifiká prejavov adolescentných chlapcov a dievčat vo vzťahu k rizikovému sexuálnemu správaniu. Česká a slovenská psychiatrie. ISSN 1212-0383, Roč. 113, č. 6 (2017), s. 258-267.

Selecká, L. & Démuthová, L. 2016. The relation of personal characteristics and brain dimorphism of women to masculine/feminine men face preference. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. ISSN 1804-7890, Vol. 6 (2), pp. 104-107.

Krys, K., Yeung, J. C., Capaldi, C. A., Lun, V. M. C., Torres, C., van Tilburg, W. A., ... & Vignoles, V. L. (2022). Societal emotional environments and cross-cultural differences in life satisfaction: A forty-nine country study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(1), 117-130.

Kurajda, D., Selecká, L., & Doktorová, D. (2022). THE PREDICTIVE IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS AND INTERNET USE TO IDENTIFY ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION DURING ADOLESCENCE. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(2).

Rojková, Z., Górna, M. & Selecká, L. (2025). Štatistika prakticky (nielen) v záverečných prácach: aplikácia štatistiky a interpretácia výsledkov v psychologickom výskume; recenzenti Ľubor Pilárik, Alexandra Mačudová. 4. dopl. vyd. Trnava: Univerzita sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave, 2025. 148 s. [print, online]. ISBN 978-80-572-0541-8.

Selecká, L., Doktorová, D. & Šebáň, P. 2023. Association Between Self-Perceived Facial Attractiveness, Personality Traits, Self-Esteem, And Anxiety in Female University Students, In: GRANT journal : European Grant Projects, Results, Research & Development, Science : Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal : European Grant Projects, Results, Research & Development, Science : Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal. - ISSN 1805-0638 (online), Roč. 12, č. 1 (2023), s. 53-58 [CD-ROM, online].

Krys, K., Kostoula, O., van Tilburg, W. A., Mosca, O., Lee, J. H., Maricchiolo, F., ... & Uchida, Y. (2025). Happiness maximization is a WEIRD way of living. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17456916231208367

• Krämer, M. D., Asselmann, E., Harzer, C., Denissen, J. J. A., & Bleidorn, W. (2026). Psychological traits predict who uses self-help products but usage is not associated with two-year personality change. Scientific Reports, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39468-6
• Zhao, M. Y. (2026). Harmony beyond hedonia and eudaimonia: Structure of well-being dimensions. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior, 9(3), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.4103/shb.shb_278_25
• Kilic, A. S., Tavsan, N., Duran, C., Ecer, E., & Otterbring, T. (2026). Tipping to the top? Three conceptual replications on tipping tendencies in the non-WEIRD world. European Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2025-0566
• Tamberg, L. A., Fisch-Romito, V., & Steinberger, J. K. (2026). Determinants of well-being: A causal framework. Social Indicators Research, 182(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-026-03816-w
• Zheng, W., Bialowolski, P., Niemiec, R. M., & Weziak-Bialowolska, D. (2026). Signature strengths use is more strongly associated with well-being in individualistic than in collectivist societies: Multilevel evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-026-01013-7
• Kramer, M. D., Hopwood, C. J., Miller, T. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2025). What explains personality change intervention effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000565
• Liew, K., Hamamura, T., & Uchida, Y. (2025). Machine learning culture: Cultural membership classification as an exploratory approach to cross-cultural psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251339313
• Lomas, T., Padgett, R. N., Ritchie-Dunham, J. L., Pawelski, J. O., Shiba, K., Johnson, B. R., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2025). Demographic variation in balance in life across 22 countries: A cross-national analysis of the global flourishing study. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-024-10407-9
• Xin, Z., Guo, Y., Zheng, J., & Xie, P. (2025). When giving social support is beneficial for well-being? Acta Psychologica, 255, 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104911
• Lomas, T., Nilsson, A. H., Kjell, O., Niemiec, R., Pawelski, J. O., Padgett, R. N., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2025). Differentiating balance and harmony through natural language analysis: A cross-national exploration of two understudied wellbeing-related concepts. Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2025.2459400
• Gomez-Corona, C., & Otterbring, T. (2025). Underrepresented populations in sensory and consumer science. Food Quality and Preference, 127, 105455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105455
• Nelson, J. M., Schnitker, S. A., & Tsang, J. A. C. (2025). Gratitude and spirituality pathways to individual and relational well-being. In Handbook of spirituality, health, and well-being (pp. 471–495).
• Tamnes, C. K., et al. (2025). The nature of the relation between mental well-being and ill-being. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(12), 2431–2440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02319-x
• Wu, C., & Wen, B. (2025). Will I be replaced? The impact of job insecurity on frontline employees in the era of AI. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-08-2024-0481
• Muchová, E., Šajgalíková, H., Copuš, L., Leško, P., & Madzík, P. (2025). Subjective well-being and values: What matters to undergraduate students? Cogent Education, 12(1), 2588543. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2588543
• Greco, G., Fabbri, C., Dutt, V., & Powell-Jackson, T. (2025). Happiness and life satisfaction: Understanding the effects of question order on subjective wellbeing measures in India. Journal of Happiness Studies, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00975-4
• Csabai, M. (2025). Health anxiety and the quest for safety: Interdisciplinary and critical perspectives.
• Stokowski, S., et al. (2025). Selection and perceived impact of walk-up songs in college baseball. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543835
• Liu, S., & Zhu, W. (2025). The happiness effect of high-quality development of China’s health and wellness industry. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1682967
• Ng, W. (2025). Subjective well-being: Outcomes, personality differences, well-being boosting interventions, and future directions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 26(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00979-0
• Nelson, J. M., Jeffrey, A., & Schnitker, S. A. (2025). Mino-bimaadiziwin and the pursuit of harmony. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 29(4), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683251345043
• Kobayashi, K. (2025). The mystery of the ultimatum game: Why we are predictably irrational.
• Atari, M., & Zewail, A. (2025). Morality across time and space. European Review of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2025.2500839
• Nissen, A. T., & Beck, E. D. (2025). The joy is mine: Re-centering the person in the study of well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70058
• Lin, L., Li, X., Pan, J., & Chan, H.-W. (2025). Measuring happiness orientations. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2528907
• Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., & Bond, M. H. (2025). God and gold: The moderating role of countries’ historical religious heritage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221251348854
• Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., et al. (2025). Mind the gap: Perceived economic inequality and the well-being gap. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506251345937
• Hermann, E., & Puntoni, S. (2025). Generative AI in marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 44(3), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156241309874
• Trager, J., & Atari, M. (2025). The immorality of too much money. PNAS Nexus, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf158
• Śmieja, M., et al. (2025). Love, culture, and well-being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102232
• Lou, X., et al. (2025). A cross-cultural study on the association between societal conditions and the idealization of happiness. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-025-10462-w
• Pan, X., Jiang, T., Yuan, W., Hao, C., Bai, Y., & Keltner, D. (2024). A balanced mind: Awe fosters equanimity via temporal distancing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(6), 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000410
• Otterbring, T., & Folwarczny, M. (2024). From WEIRD to worldwide. Food Quality and Preference, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105175
• Kim, S.-Y. (2024). Examining 35 years of individualism–collectivism research in Asia: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101988
• Løvold, H. S., Sæther, K.-W., & Dyrdal, G. M. (2024). Three moods of approaching friluftsliv and their relationships with sustainability. Annals of Leisure Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2024.2358753

Václaviková, I., Selecká, L., Démuthová, S., Blatný, M. & Hrdlička, M. 2020. The Predictive Importance of Selected Protective Factors against Different Types of Antisocial Behavior Manifested by Adolescent Boys and Girls. Studia Psychologica : An International Journal for Research and Theory in Psychology. ISSN 0039-3320, Roč. 62, č. 2 (2020), s. 138-147.

• Sözen, R., & Haidar, C. H. (2025). Alla såg när han placerades, ingen såg när han kom hem: En kvalitativ studie om socialtjänstens stöd till unga pojkar i övergången från HVB-placering till hemmet (s. 56). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
• Lenka Kollerová, L., Sweet, T. M., Lee, J. J., Bardach, L., Klocek, A., & Killen, M. (2024). Peer dislike and future school adjustment in early adolescence: Recognizing consequences for both boys and girls. Child and Youth Care Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-024-09836-2
• Santana Medina, S. (2021). La conducta antisocial en adolescentes con y sin medidas judiciales. IPSE-ds, 14, 69–79.
• Rojková, Z., & Kundrát, J. (2020). Možnosti využitia dotazníka SMF alkoholového správania ako indikátora problémového pitia. In Kondášove dni 2020 (pp. 68–80). Trnava: FF UCM.
• Rojková, Z., & Mičková, Z. (2020). Risk and protective factors of drug-using behaviour among adolescents in Slovakia. In Quaere 2020 (pp. 991–999). Hradec Králové: Magnanimitas.

Demuthova, S., Vaclavikova, I., Selecka, L., & Blatny, M. (2020). The problem of self-disclosure of self-harming behaviour in adolescence. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 01-19.

• Torabi, F., Aflakseir, A., Hadianfard, H., & Rahimi, C. (2025). Predicting attitudes toward seeking psychological professional help based on the health belief model with the mediation of stigma in adolescents with depressive symptoms. Health Nexus, 3(3), 1–17.
• López Ocaña, J. (2023). Inclusión social, salud mental y bienestar emocional: Perspectivas académicas e interventivas (p. 169). Avilés: EAPN-AS.
• Chan, H. W. C., Ford, T., Janssens, A., Anderson, J., Gavin, J., & Russell, A. E. (2025). “Thrown in the deep end”: A qualitative study of barriers secondary school staff encounter when addressing self-harm. BMC Public Health, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22826-w
• Brausch, A. M., Kalgren, T., & Howd, C. (2024). Characteristics of disclosure of suicidal and nonsuicidal behaviors in a clinical sample of adolescents. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01269-8
• Schmied, E., Hack, L., Connemann, B., Sosic-Vasic, Z., & Kroener, J. (2024). You’re not alone: Imagery rescripting for adolescents who self-harm. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1395603
• Harahap, A. M., & Drajat Kuncoro, R. Z. I. (2024). “Curhat” sebagai bentuk pendampingan sebaya kepada remaja putri pelaku “ngebarcode”. Adaptasi: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Keagamaan, 1(1), 95–115.
• Ran, M. S., Xiao, Y., & Rohlof, H. (2024). Editorial: The impact of COVID-19 on internet addiction, suicidal behavior, and study behavior in adolescents in various cultural contexts. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1375244
• Branjerdporn, G., et al. (2023). What is helpful and what is challenging for the caregivers of young people receiving interventions to prevent suicide? Children, 10, 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10111801
• Do, R., et al. (2023). Korean adolescents’ coping strategies on self-harm, ADHD, insomnia during COVID-19: Text mining of social media big data. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1192123
• Fan, K., et al. (2023). Neighborhood resources, discrimination, and mental health treatment access for youth engaging in self-injury. Stigma and Health, 10(4).
• Bugawa, A., & Ayoub, A. (2023). The role of regulatory foci and information seeking behavior on self-disclosure on social media. Information Sciences Letters, 12(6), 2551–2566.
• Rheinberger, D., et al. (2023). Parents of adolescents who experience suicidal phenomena: A scoping review of their experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20.
• Yang, J., et al. (2023). Relationship between mental health literacy and professional psychological help-seeking attitudes in China: A chain mediation model. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1).
• Rojková, Z., Vavrová, M., & Ozimá, T. (2022). Personality factors of tobacco behavior in university students: Comparison of cigarette vs. smokeless products users and non-smokers. AD ALTA, 12(1), 182–186.
• Amita, N., & Wahyuningsih, H. (2021). Facilitative parenting of adolescent self-disclosure. Altruistik, 1(2), 102–110.
• Nerubasska, A. O., Sarnavska, O. V., & Paľškov, K. E. (2021). Parametric analysis of communication systems. Aktuálni Problemi Filosofii ta Sociologii, 28, 14–18.
• Šefarová, I. (2020). Pacienti s automutiláciou – reflexie z klinickopsychologickej praxe. In Kondášove dni 2020 (pp. 81–86). Trnava: FF UCM.

Krys, K., Yeung, J. C., Capaldi, C. A., Lun, V. M. C., Torres, C., van Tilburg, W. A., ... & Vignoles, V. L. (2022). Societal emotional environments and cross-cultural differences in life satisfaction: A forty-nine country study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(1), 117-130.

• Chaykina, M., Gómez-Balcácer, L., Pontarollo, N., & Segovia, J. (2026). Institutional quality and life satisfaction in Latin America: Insights from a within-between approach. Development Studies Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2026.2618678
• Olechowski, M., et al. (2025). Cultural religiosity moderates the relationship between being in love and subjective well-being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102227
• Ma, J., Saita, K., Kaneko, F., & Okamura, H. (2025). Stressors during the COVID-19 pandemic in international students: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22380-5
• Chen, X., Zhou, J., Li, D., Li, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, J. (2025). Assessing care-based power-assertive parenting in Chinese families: Parent and child measures. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001978
• Pendergast, P. M., & Wadsworth, T. (2025). Acculturation to accumulation? Variation in the income–subjective well-being relationship by language among Latine respondents in the U.S. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70056
• Hernandez, N., et al. (2025). Compassion in Mexico and the United States: Unpacking cultural differences. Behavioral Sciences, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15060732
• Song, H., Chan, J. S., & Ryan, C. (2024). Differences and similarities in the use of nine emotion regulation strategies in Western and East-Asian cultures: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 55(8), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241285006
• Craske, M. G., Dunn, B. D., Meuret, A. E., Rizvi, S. J., & Taylor, C. T. (2024). Positive affect and reward processing in the treatment of depression, anxiety and trauma. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(10), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00355-4
• Gu, S. (2023). Impact of cross-cultural differences on international business negotiations and corresponding strategies. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 5(10), 117–123.
• Segura Bonilla, O., García Sánchez, D., Rodríguez Soto, J., & Villalobos Arce, G. (2023). Bioeconómica, innovación y calidad de vida (p. 53). Heredia: CINPE.
• Song, J.-H., Cho, S. I., Trommsdorff, G., Cole, P., & Niraula, S. (2023). Being sensitive in their own way: Parental ethnotheories of caregiver sensitivity and child emotion regulation across five countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1283748
• Røysamb, E., et al. (2023). Worldwide well-being: Simulated twins reveal genetic and (hidden) environmental influences. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
• Dryjanska, L. (2023). Proculturation shaped by social representations of academic migrants from Italy to the United States. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
• Mosanya, M., & Kwiatkowska, A. (2023). Multicultural identity integration versus compartmentalization as predictors of subjective well-being for third culture kids. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5).
• Denoux, P., & Paraskevi, S. (2022). Cross-cultural psychology à la française: An overview of interdisciplinary intercultural studies and intercultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53, 817–846.

Selecká, L., & Václaviková, I. (2017). Protektívne faktory voči antisociálnym prejavom u adolescentných chlapcov a dievčat. In L. Pitel (Ed.), Sociálne procesy a osobnosť 2016: Zborník príspevkov (Nový Smokovec, 12.–14. september 2016) (pp. 419–427). Ústav experimentálnej psychológie, Centrum spoločenských a psychologických vied SAV.

• Mičková, Z. (2024). Psychosociálne operátory somatickej a úzkostnej symptomatológie v období adolescencie (p. 144). Trnava: Univerzita sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave.
• Demuthová, S. (2019). Factors in the school and family environment affecting delinquent behaviour with respect to the severity of delinquency and gender. Conference of the International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 12(1), 123–133.
• Mičková, Z. (2019). Vzťah rodinných faktorov, alkoholového správania, fajčenia a symptomatológie somatických problémov adolescentov. In Sociálne procesy a osobnosť 2018. Košice: SVÚ CSPV SAV.
• Rojková, Z. (2019). Nárazové pitie u adolescentov: Protektívne a rizikové faktory (SAHA). In Sociálne procesy a osobnosť 2018. Košice: SVÚ CSPV SAV.
• Rojková, Z., Démuthová, S., & Misofová, C. (2019). Rodinné faktory v období dospievania ako determinanty delikvencie v dospelosti. In Kondášove dni 2019 (p. 98). Trnava: UCM.
• Mičková, Z. (2019). The relationship of trust and communication in adolescents towards parents in a post-divorce family arrangement. AD ALTA, 9(1), 192–195.
• Demuthová, S. (2019). The school environment as a source of somatic problems in adolescents. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(2), 59–71.
• Démuthová, S. (2018). The influence of the school environment on teenage delinquency. Journal of Teaching and Education, 8(2), 293–300.

Projekt: APVV-17-0123 "Sebapoškodzovanie: vymedzenie, prevalencia, ovplyvňujúce faktory a implikácie pre klinické intervencie" (člen riešiteľského tímu)

Charakteristika projektu: Úmyselné spôsobovanie zranení sebe samému v adolescentnej populácii je natoľko nežiadúcim a z mnohých (zdravotných i psychologických) ohľadov rizikovým správaním, že jeho skúmanie psychológmi je nevyhnutné. Doposiaľ bolo sebapoškodzovanie chápané predovšetkým ako symptóm prítomný pri niektorých psychiatrických diagnózach, prípadne pri disharmonickom vývine osobnosti, a tak sa vzťahovalo predovšetkým na klinickú populáciu. Najnovšie zistenia zo zahraničia, ako i tendencie zaznamenané v domácom prostredí však upozorňujú na skutočnosť, že v oblasti sebapoškodzovania došlo k zmenám v prevalencii, formách, účeloch, ale i viazanosti na klinické syndrómy. Aktuálnosť témy reflektuje aj najnovšia, 5. revízia Diagnostického a štatistického manuálu duševných porúch, ktorá v závere kapitoly "Conditions for Further Study" spomína práve problematiku nesuicidálneho sebapoškodzovania ako oblasti vyžadujúcej intenzívny výskum. Predložený projekt plánuje realizovať základný výskum, ktorý poskytne dáta týkajúce sa prevalencie sebapoškodzovania v populácii, jeho foriem a dôvodov, chápania pojmu samotnou ohrozenou skupinou, vymedzenia tohto pojmu v kontexte výskytu nových foriem a spolupôsobiacich faktorov, ako aj etablovania relevantnej metodiky na zisťovanie výskytu a špecifických súvislostí tohto javu. Neoddeliteľnou súčasťou bude sprístupnenie získaných výsledkov čo najširšiemu okruhu profesionálov, formulácia implikácií pre prípadné klinické intervencie a publikovanie výsledkov výskumu na relevantných vedeckých fórach.

Hyperlink projektu (výstupy, ohlasy, finančná dotácia, časové rozpätie): http://kpsych.ff.ucm.sk/sk/2021/

Projekt: VEGA 1/0251/21 "Atraktivita ľudskej tváre - kľúčové charakteristiky a psychologické mechanizmy jej posudzovania" (člen riešiteľského tímu)

Charakteristika projektu: Percepcia ľudskej tváre a jej atribútov predstavuje kľúčový moment sociálnej interakcie. Hodnotenie atraktivity a jej vplyv na prežívanie a správanie jedinca boli a sú predmetom dlhodobého skúmania mnohých vedných oblastí - estetiky, kunsthistórie, filozofie, biológie a pod. Psychologické vedy však v tomto kontexte neponúkajú jen deskripciu sledovaného fenoménu, ale disponujú potenciálom explanácie interných mechanizmov a dôvodov takéhoto posudzovania jedincom. Aktuálne možnosti výpočtovej techniky (konkrétne možnosť generovania počítačových tvárových kompozitov a cielená úprava ich špecifických atribútov) umožňujú veľmi presne sledovať dôsledky špecifických zmien v atribútoch percipovanej tváre na jej vnímanie a hodnotenie jedincom. Hlavným cieľom projektu je identifikácia kľúčových charakteristík ovplyvňujúcich percepciu atraktivity ľudskej tváre (na strane percipovaného objektu aj na strane percipienta) a psychologických mechanizmov, ktoré sa na percepcii a hodnotení atraktivity ľudskej tváre podieľajú.

Hyperlink projektu (výstupy, ohlasy, finančná dotácia, časové rozpätie): http://kpsych.ff.ucm.sk/sk/2021/